Following on from last week's blog about Islam; In the early days, Muhammad tried to get people to follow him, but initially it failed. This carried on for a number of years. Once fed up with his efforts, along with his small band of raiders, he became a minor warlord. Once he started killing people, his followers unsurprisingly grew from 100 to 1000 and to hundreds of thousands all agreeing to conquest, slavery, rape and murder.
According to the Qu'ran, Mohammed was to have lived in Mecca for 52 years from 580CE to 638CE. All this said. It now seems. Everything about the early beginnings of Islam is being questioned.
- Mohammed could neither read nor write, so who wrote the Qu'ran?
- The earliest partial manuscript of the Qu'ran is dated 800-CE and is in Dublin University
- The next credible. portion of the Qu'ran is dated 1450-CE.
- German called Heinrich Ferdinand Wustenfeld (1808-1899) wrote the Sira (The biography of Muhammad) in 1860, which is now is seen as demanded reading for Muslims, 1200 years after he was supposed to have been alive.
- The first person to challenge the writings of Islam was called Abu al-Walid Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Rushd in the 11th Century. He was exiled!
- To date there are 24 different versions of the Koran, not one as everyone is told.
- There is no archaeological evidence Mecca existed in the time when Muhammad was supposed to have been alive. Not one peer reviewed, archaeology dig as ever happened in Mecca. No non-Muslim archaeologists are even allowed to look at anything in Mecca. And where Muhammad was supposed to have lived, they have built a multibillion-dollar shopping mall.
To follow on from this you can watch Jay Smith and his recent YouTube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wy_iD6Lf6MY Link here) which presents a case exposing the fact, the Qur’an says Mohammed lived for 52 years in Mecca in or around and around 628-CE. However, in light of there being no archaeological proof or records that Mecca existed before 800AD or CE. The earliest reference to Mecca is in 11th and 15th centuries, yet for Mecca to be the most important city to mankind, it is only mentioned once by name in Sura Chapter 48:24!
Finally, the language used in the Qu'ran is Nabatean Aramaic from the North and Jordan, yet for Mecca to have existed at the time of writing, it would have been the Subaja dialect and language from Yemen in the south. Therefore, again, no Mecca no Mohammed. We can't say no Islam, because it definitely does exist, but this possibly plays into a larger narrative which I'll come on to later about the 'End Times'.
So, no Mecca, no Mohammed. The writings contradict. But why is it so popular. Well, if many given a free rein to rape, kill, and destroy and are told it's God's will, they'll do it, Especially if they're taught from an early age.
If you look at Islam, the Hadith and Sunnah concur, they want to kill all Jews and Christians and if you don't say the shahada and convert, they do, and plan, to kill you. If you're marginally useful, they will get you to pay the jizya tax. Oh! and they intend to enslave your children, rape your family all in the name of Muhammad and Allah. Which also follows their strategy of increasing percentages of population to establish Islam; First Islam invades via illegal migration and when they are more substantial in number they get instilled in public positions, such as Mayors, and positions in government, from MPs to more important positions. We now have a Muslim Home Secretary in the UK government. Whilst the recent bill to outlaw Islamophobia has been ditched, it has resurfaced as Muslim hate.
The UKs problem is one of useful idiots who think they know more and better about the middle east, than those who live there. UK politicians' intention is short term gain, dressing it up as multi-culturalism, saying diversity is our strength. This is not what the UK want. I agree, our borders should be welcoming to those who want to genuinely live and work here. When it comes to refugees, I would welcome every believer in Christ, but it is strange we don't see thousands of Christian men boarding rubber dinghies without wives or children, desperately trying to get into the UK to get their new debit card and a room in a luxury hotel.
No, I'm not xenophobic. But I do recognise an abysmal situation when I see one. A land of milk and honey is offered to every Muslim around the world and west are saying once you get here, we'll put you up in a nice hotel and give you a credit card as long as you vote for us, and the politicians can give themselves a Kalergi-Coudenhove gold star, whilst they continue sucking up to the WEF and Davos.
Yes, it's all wrong, and Reform seems to be saying the right thing. But looking at this from a believer’s perspective, it is right and fitting to not allow entry to outside people whose religion professes to demand killing all Christians and Jews, so that they can get an Islamic gold star when they get to their heaven.
There is nothing in the Bible that says welcome people who have already stated they want to kill you. And whilst they are not roaming the streets in packs, with guns and painting 'Nazareen' on our doors, their behaviour towards young girls is never out of the papers. There is no expectation for the good Sarmatian, to fear for his life or that of his family.
No country can import a social construct and naively expect foreign populations to assimilate with the another when they are inextricably opposed and set to achieve dominance, in religion, civic control, and law. This is simple economic migration and has nothing to do with bringing valuable skills to another country, far from it. This week not
With so many religions from Taylorism to Hinduism to Sikhism, Buddhism and Catholicism as well as atheism, it shows there are many to keep mankind busy, But here's the thing; We are all singularly, and individually responsible for our own salvation. No one can attend the church and get into heaven because the pastor said so.
Our entry visa to heaven is predicated on stating Jesus is Lord, and our personal and outward demonstration of our belief is to get baptised. And before anyone says anything, I do not subscribe for conversion to happen by saying a prayer and you're in. Your baptism proves to God, the demonic, and your worldly family, you have made a commitment to Christ.
This is not the baby sprinkling but full immersion deal, that proves and acknowledges we die with Christ, then rise, from the death of our worldly and bodily existence, into a life with Christ, being sealed forever.
And this is all that Satan wants to stop. He intends to keep mankind busy and focused on anything other than the one true God. To do that. It is accurate to say that Satan is a master of deception, sleight of hand, and outright blatant propaganda and misinformation. No matter which 'race' or people group we're talking about, the only focus is on persecuting Christians. God wants us for eternity and Satan wants us dead.
The funny thing is, once we get baptised, we're actually dead to this world, but alive to the next. The Bible says we're in the world, but not of the work (John 17: 14-16)
In the next episode I'm going to talk about what completely spun out my mum and dad and the proof I had obtained.
Until the, bye for now,
Nigel
