The Future of Food: Control, Crisis, and the Shift in Global Agriculture

The global food system is undergoing significant changes, driven by a combination of technological advancements, policy decisions, and the influence of powerful individuals and organisations. Concerns have been raised about the motivations behind these changes, particularly regarding who controls the food supply and the long-term impacts on farmers and consumers.

It is essential we explore these issues, focusing on the role of Bill Gates in purchasing farmland, the concept of 15 Minute Cities, directives from the World Economic Forum (WEF), and controversial policies like encouraging the consumption of insects and the destruction of livestock.

Bill Gates Buying Arable Farmland: The Largest Landowner in the USA—Why?

Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft and one of the wealthiest individuals in the world, has quietly become the largest private owner of farmland in the United States. As of recent reports, Gates owns approximately 242,000 acres of farmland across 18 states.

Motivations Behind Farmland Purchases

Control of Food Production: Critics argue that Gates’ extensive farmland ownership could give him significant influence over food production and distribution in the U.S. This level of control raises concerns about the potential for manipulating food supply chains or prioritising certain agricultural practices that align with specific agendas, such as genetically modified organisms (GMOs) or synthetic foods.
Sustainable Agriculture Initiatives: Gates has expressed interest in using his farmland to promote sustainable agriculture practices, which he believes are crucial for addressing climate change and food security. However, this approach has sparked debate about whether it serves the public good or furthers private interests.
Investment Strategy: Some analysts view Gates' investment in farmland as a strategic move to diversify his portfolio, betting on the long-term value of agricultural land as global populations grow and food demand increases. However, the fact he is investing in lab-grown meat and insects, could very well mean he is looking to restrict society from using land for farming, thereby forcing humanity to eat bugs as a financially manageable strategy rather than raising cattle, sheep or pork.

15 Minute Cities: The Urban Food Supply Chain Redefined

The concept of 15 Minute Cities, where residents can access most of their daily needs within a 15-minute walk or bike ride, is being promoted as a solution for sustainable urban living. However, this model also has implications for food access and distribution.

Food Access and Urban Planning

Localised Food Production: 15 Minute Cities may encourage localised food production through urban farming, community gardens, and vertical farming. This could reduce reliance on long-distance food supply chains and support more resilient local economies. What if this is not possible because land has been purchased by unscrupulous investors and will not be allowed for farming.
Supply Chain Control: Critics worry that the concentration of food production within small urban areas could lead to greater control by local authorities or private entities, potentially limiting consumer choice and increasing vulnerability to disruptions in the supply chain.
Impact on Rural Farmers: The shift towards urban-centred food systems may marginalise rural farmers, who could struggle to compete with the efficiencies of urban agriculture or face new regulatory challenges that favour city-based food production.

WEF Directives: Shaping the Global Food Agenda

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has become increasingly influential in shaping global policy, including in the realm of food production and consumption. The WEF’s directives often focus on sustainability, climate change, and innovation, but they also raise concerns about the centralisation of power and decision-making.

Key WEF Food Initiatives

Sustainable Agriculture: The WEF advocates for the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices, including the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, water conservation, and the transition to plant-based diets. While these goals are commendable, some fear that they could lead to the marginalisation of traditional farming practices and the consolidation of agricultural production in the hands of a few large corporations.
Technological Solutions: The WEF supports the use of technology to address food security challenges, such as digital farming platforms, blockchain for supply chain transparency, and lab-grown meats. Critics argue that these technologies could lead to greater corporate control over the food supply and reduce the role of small-scale farmers.

Eating Bugs: The Push Towards Alternative Protein Sources

The idea of consuming insects as a sustainable protein source has gained traction in recent years, promoted by organisations like the WEF and environmental groups, however, it is abhorrent. Insect farming is touted as a solution to the environmental impacts of traditional livestock farming, because it can be automated and rigidly manage. Those in the know will remember the Charlton Heston film Soylent Green!

Their Case for Us Eating Bugs

Environmental Benefits: Insects require fewer resources to raise than traditional livestock, such as cattle or pigs. They produce lower greenhouse gas emissions, require less water, and can be fed on organic waste, making them an environmentally friendly protein source. However, here we are with a 2000-year history of eating plant-based, plant-fed nutrients, called beef, and we have not seen one iota of a problem, except that which is touted by the press.
Nutritional Value: Insects are rich in protein, vitamins, and minerals, making them a nutritious alternative to conventional meats, for other insects!

Public Resistance and Ethical Concerns

Cultural Resistance: Chat GPT says: In many Western cultures, the idea of eating insects is met with resistance due to cultural taboos and perceptions of insects as pests. This cultural barrier presents a significant challenge to the widespread adoption of insect-based foods.
Economic Implications: The push towards insect consumption could impact traditional livestock farmers, potentially leading to economic displacement in regions where livestock farming is a major industry.

What a load of rubbish! I do not believe anyone in their right mind would dream up such a thing. However, when we know Satan is looking to demean God’s creation and attack humanity, it makes complete sense that Satan, his demons and cronies, would be completely up for forcing mankind to eat bugs!

Destroying Millions of Animals in the USA: Forcing a Food Crisis?

There have been reports that millions of animals in the U.S. have been culled or destroyed, supposedly to control disease outbreaks or manage supply chain issues. Yes, supply chain issues! Some conspiracy theories suggest that these actions are part of a deliberate effort to create food shortages and manipulate the market. You know what I think! When you combine these facts with bugs and lab meat, it all makes perfect sense.

The Reality of Livestock Culling

Disease Control: In many cases, the destruction of livestock is related to disease outbreaks, such as avian flu or swine fever, where culling is seen as a necessary measure to prevent the spread of disease and protect public health. But first, one needs to correlate these issues with the actual fires that happened.
Economic Pressures: Supply chain disruptions, market fluctuations, and rising costs have also led to the culling of animals, particularly during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. These actions are sometimes taken to prevent further economic losses in the face of reduced demand or logistical challenges. Reduced demand only happens when there is a reduced population, which, apart from COVID hasn’t happened on a scale that would necessitate a culling of millions of livestock

Theories of Market Manipulation

Creating Scarcity: Some theorists argue that the destruction of livestock is a deliberate strategy to create artificial scarcity, driving up food prices and increasing profits for large agribusinesses. This theory suggests a coordinated effort to manipulate the market, though it remains largely speculative.

Paying Farmers Not to Grow Food: A Controversial Policy

Government programs that pay farmers not to grow certain crops have been in place in various forms for decades. These programs are intended to stabilise market prices, conserve soil, and manage supply levels, but they also have their critics.

The Purpose of Crop Reduction Programs

Market Stabilisation: By reducing the supply of certain crops, these programs aim to prevent market oversaturation, which can drive down prices and harm farmers' livelihoods. This is particularly important for crops that are prone to price volatility.
Environmental Conservation: In some cases, these payments are part of conservation efforts, encouraging farmers to leave land fallow or to plant cover crops that improve soil health.

Criticism and Consequences

Food Insecurity: Critics argue that paying farmers not to grow food contributes to food insecurity, particularly in times of crisis. They contend that these programs prioritise market interests over the basic need to produce sufficient food for the population.
Influence of Agribusiness: There are concerns that these programs disproportionately benefit large agribusinesses, which can afford to take land out of production while small farmers struggle to survive.

Taxing Farmers Out of Business: A Threat to Food Sovereignty

Tax policies that disproportionately impact farmers can have significant consequences for food production and rural economies. Some argue that these policies are part of a broader effort to centralise control over the food supply.

The Impact of Taxation on Farmers

Increased Costs: Rising taxes on land, equipment, and inputs like fertiliser and fuel can make it difficult for farmers to remain profitable, especially small and medium-sized operations. This can lead to farm closures and consolidation of agricultural land into fewer hands.
Loss of Food Sovereignty: As more farmers are forced out of business, the concentration of food production in the hands of large corporations increases. This threatens food sovereignty, the idea that communities should have control over the way food is produced, distributed, and consumed.

The Role of Policy in Shaping the Food System

Regulatory Burden: In addition to taxation, farmers face a complex web of regulations that can be costly and time-consuming to navigate. While some regulations are necessary for food safety and environmental protection, others are seen as overly burdensome and a barrier to entry for new farmers.

Conclusion

The global food system is at a crossroads, influenced by powerful entities and complex policies that shape the way food is produced, distributed, and consumed. From the acquisition of farmland by billionaires like Bill Gates to the push for alternative proteins and the potential centralisation of food production in urban centres, these trends raise important questions about the future of food. As these dynamics continue to evolve, it is crucial to remain vigilant about who controls the food supply and how these changes will impact farmers, consumers, and the global economy.

You only have to look at the European farmers who demonstrated in Belgium, Holland and Germany and to see the support from society, to realise that the politicians and financial controllers don’t always get what they want.

Clearly, the ‘elites’ will maintain their own supply of naturally grown meat and will certainly not be eating bugs or be forced or coerced to take injections to make big-pharma richer.

Only you can decide what you think is right for you and your family, but suffice to say, neither government nor big agriculture can be trusted and never could, it seems more people are becoming aware and making sensible decision for themselves.

The only thing we can trust is where were going once we leave this earth. We can pray for wisdom, and we can certainly do our research and keep our minds open to new ideas and not to become stagnant in our thinking.

Eat the meat, keep off the milk, sugar and carbs. Research what the keto diet is all about and just eat once a day and you’ll be good for decades.